By admin / October 15, 2020
You must be familiar with the Oxford Dictionary. One of the great lexicographies in the world, it is considered the most accurate and comprehensive dictionary since 1884.
Yup! The Professor and The Madman (2019) will explore the history of the preparation of the Oxford Dictionary which is wrapped in stories of love, sacrifice and anger.
William Chester Minor was a wartime medic. He was traumatized after killing a man. Since then, his life has always been restless and must be under surveillance by the security forces. Even so, Doctor Minor will feel calm when he reads many books. This is what made him interested in becoming a contributor to the preparation of the Oxford Dictionary.
Top Movie Site
Not only bringing together two top Academy Award-winning actors, Mel Gibson and Sean Penn, on the same stage, the film The Professor and The Madman also stars Natalie Dormer, Jennifer Ehle, Eddie Marsan, and many more. Movie Review
By admin / October 12, 2020
Deerskin came from the head of Quentin Dupieux, the director who made Rubber (2010). While more normal than the satirical horror of the killer tires, this latest work is still an impossible film to predict where it will go, at least on the majority of occasions. Just look at the opening scene, where some teenagers put their jackets into the trunk of a car, telling the camera that they won’t be wearing jackets again forever. A prologue for criticism of humanity’s destruction of nature? Apparently not. Top Movie Site
A moment later, we become acquainted with the protagonist. Georges is his name, played by Jean Dujardin, who is best known for winning the Oscar for Best Actor, through his role in The Artist (2011). Georges spent over 7,500 euros redeeming the reindeer leather jacket of his dreams. “Killer style”. That’s how Georges calls his style. Designations that later present other meanings.
Georges was willing to run out of money, so he had to use his wedding ring as collateral when he was in arrears for the hotel room rental fee, even eating from scraps in the trash, for the sake of the jacket. His new wife left him, as well as blocking their credit cards, which aggravated Georges’ situation. But he didn’t care. Most importantly, the dream jacket has been obtained. Georges continued to admire his appearance, filmed himself posing in the mirror, then began to engage in conversation with the jacket, as if it was alive.
Dupieux, who also wrote the script, developed a strange, surreal atmosphere. Many people here feel “not alive”, creating the feel of a thick deadpan. Deerskin is reminiscent of Roy Andersson’s works, except that the pacing is faster, lighter, more dynamic, and has more blood. Meanwhile, his humor becomes more intriguing as Georges’ behavior and words become more absurd. Some are black comedy, some are satire, some are pure silliness, but the response expected from the audience is always the same: WTF ?! Best Movie
Every night, Georges stops by the bar where Denise (Adèle Haenel) works as a bartender. When asked about his profession, Georges lied and admitted he was a filmmaker. The lie got deeper, because Denise, who turned out to be an editor, started asking a lot of questions. Long story short, the lie forced Georges to continue recording, continuing his “film production”, with a story inspired by his “chat” with the jacket. Georges wants to be the only man in the world to wear a jacket, while the jacket wants to be the only jacket in the world. Georges is someone with no knowledge of film, who makes films to fulfill egos and ridiculous ambitions. Sounds familiar.
Dujardin gave birth to a loser character who the audience was happy to laugh at, especially every time he boasted of his “killer style”. But over time, Georges’ silliness was accompanied by horror. He is not sympathetic, but his actions are fun to follow, even tend to be addictive. I don’t mind if the film lasts longer.
The question is, what exactly is Deerskin trying to say? A portrait of a man with a mental illness? Unhealthy obsession? A flirtation with the film industry? Or the story of a man who hides his loneliness and vulnerability behind a shell of masculinity? Not all of the above. Even after Deerskin hit its closing moments, I’m sure Quentin Dupieux, able to wrap up an entertaining 77 minutes full of absurdities, surprises, and turns, just wanted to have fun playing with the audience’s expectations. Both expectations regarding the direction of the flow, and the substance in it. If there was anything Deerskin wanted to flirt with, it would be the audience themselves, who were trying (too) hard to read the contents of the story. Like George’s nonsense about his profession as a filmmaker that doesn’t need to be taken seriously, so does this film. Movie Review
By admin / October 8, 2020
When the majority of films on the theme of empowerment from India cover their sensitivity issues with light and warm family stories, Dolly Kitty Aur Woh Chamakte Sitare takes a slightly different path. Coming from the hands of director and scriptwriter Alankrita Shrivastava, who previously gave birth to Lipstick Under My Burkha (2016), feminism is conveyed more emphatically, by bringing gender issues through a sexual perspective that challenges the audience’s thinking. Unfortunately, this time Alankrita has the ambition to summarize too many problems that actually interfere with the course of the storytelling.
Living in a planned city called Noida, the financial condition of Radha “Dolly” Yadav (Konkona Sen Sharma) and her husband, Amit (Aamir Bashir), are actually stable, but they have difficulty paying off the mortgage for a luxury apartment, which has not even been built. Meanwhile, Dolly’s younger cousin, Kajal (Bhumi Pednekar), wants to live with them. Coming from Bihar, he has the ambition to pursue his dreams in a big city. Like many overseas people from the village, it did not take Kajal long to realize that life in the city is tougher than he thought. Top Movie Site
After only working as a factory worker for a while, he immediately left. Not only that, Amit’s behavior with “naughty hands” who often steals opportunities, makes Kajal uncomfortable and makes him want to live in another place. Of course it’s not an easy matter, considering Kajal doesn’t have enough money to have his own place. This is an example of how male depravity ruins a woman’s life. Kajal shouldn’t be confused about finding a place to live. She shouldn’t feel insecure under the roof of her own family.
Finally, Kajal found a new job that provided many facilities, including a place to live. Red Rose Romance is the name of the company. A phone sex service provider. Using the name “Kitty”, Kajal uses his voice to serve the lusts of perverted men, one of whom even calls and masturbates while his wife is lying in a coma. But through that job, Kajal falls in love for the first time, with a client named Pradeep (Vikrant Massey), who lulls him with his romantic words.
Apart from the installment business, Dolly still had other problems. She suffers from HSDD (Hypoactive Sexual Desire Disorder), in which Dolly loses her desire to have sex with Amit. Until Osmaan (Amol Parashar), the young student delivering food, steals his attention. Dolly’s problems don’t stop there. Her youngest son, Pappu (Kalp Shah), has a tendency to cross-dressing, likes to wear his mother’s make-up, wants to try on dresses, and prefers dolls to toy cars. When his school held a field trip, Pappu wanted to go with a group of girls to the puppet museum, but it was forbidden, because male students SHOULD go to the train museum. Alankrita commented on the colonization of gender identity, which has become firmly embedded in conventional culture.
Reading the description above, you might catch a glimpse of how many issues Dolly Kitty is trying to pinpoint. Apart from the freedom of female sexuality represented by her two protagonists’ quest for sexual satisfaction, there are issues with gender identity, harassment, parenting, and the tendency to blame wives for family problems (Dolly is considered the cause of Pappu not growing “as it should be”). At almost every point, the film imposes a new branch of the story, some of which are forced to connect with each other.
Whereas the urgency of the issues is high and deserves a more solid explanation. I take my hat off for Alankrita’s courage to break through the taboo. The audience was once asked to ask, “Which is holier? Is the “halal” profession as an accountant who is treated like a waitress for a coffee maker with a low salary until they are forced to steal office money, or is the “haram” profession filled with money without any cheating? ”. I guess nothing is holier or dirtier. There is no true truth. Only two women are struggling to make a living. Best Movie
Of course, the film’s greatest courage comes when it challenges the audience’s perspective on female sexuality. The climax shows the male occupation of women’s freedom to express their sexuality. Decisive, sharp, but sadly, too trying to surprise the audience, and once again, forcing the linkages between the branches of the plot.
But there is no sense of being forced into the acting of the two main actresses, which naturally brings to life the two female figures who are required to always fight. Yes, both of them made some mistakes, but the stern and sympathetic looks of Bhumi Pednekar and Konkona Sen Sharma, ensure that we continue to support them, who walk in the area of gray morality. Movie Review
By admin / October 5, 2020
The One and Only Ivan is not much different, and when the story is wrapped in Disney-style packaging, the result is a treat for an identity crisis, while entertaining, of course, with a heart.
Indeed, here there are no alien invasions, teenagers trapped in the eagle’s body forever, or depressive conclusions in which the protagonist goes on a suicide mission. The main character is Ivan (Sam Rockwell), a gorilla who is the main star of Mack’s Big Top Mall circus show (Bryan Cranston). If the other animals had to do a trick, Ivan could just show off his savage side, beating his chest while roaring. But gradually, public interest faded. They are threatened with bankruptcy. Top Movie Site
Until Mack brings in a new animal, namely an adorable little elephant named Ruby (Brooklynn Prince). Under the care of Stella (Angelina Jolie) the senior elephant, Ruby immediately became the star of the show. Ivan was forced to accept his stardom marginalized. Until an event forced Ivan to put his ego aside, for the sake of the survival of the animals, especially Ruby.
At first glance it sounds like a children’s film about a talking animal, right? However, as we get to know each character, it becomes clearer that The One and Only Ivan is not that simple. A flashback explains how Mack was abandoned by his wife, because Ivan, who was adopted as a baby, started growing up and often created chaos in the house. Then about Julia (Ariana Greenblatt), the daughter of a Big Top Mall employee, who interacts with Ivan almost every day. It is implied that Julia’s mother is not doing well (possibly contracting cancer).
The background of the cramped cages houses a line of animals that often act funny, like an illusion that obscures the dark reality outside. Speaking of cages, The One and Only Ivann also raised the issue of exploitation of animals, which are hunted in the middle of their habitat by humans. Some died, some were thrown in confinement as material for viewing in circuses and zoos. Best Movie
For humans, the animals are only a means of making money, which can be easily removed. Despite caring for Ivan from infancy, when financial demands came, Mack easily replaced the gorilla as the star of the show. As for the animals in cages, they are used to being locked up for almost their entire life, making them forget the feeling of freedom.
Here there is a contradiction. Mike White’s script (School of Rock, Pitch Perfect 3) talks about the importance for animals to live in their natural habitat, yet simultaneously celebrating showmanship. This was reinforced by the performance of Thea Sharrock (Me Before You), which showed more of a magical side than the exploitative side of each performance. Maybe the goal is not to make it all black and white, but what feels confused about determining the direction, between flicking the issue above, or making an all-age Disney-style film as usual.
In fact, The One and Only Ivan fulfills almost all of the requirements to be a touching animal-themed film. Sharrock is good at building emotions through visual language, as in Stella and Ruby’s first meeting, which is depicted through two touching trunk. The quality of CGI is capable of creating rich expressions on the faces of animal characters, especially Ivan. The orchestral music composed by Craig Armstrong (Moulin Rouge !, The Great Gatsby, Me Before You) is also effective at stirring up feelings, including the ending, which, in effect, is another manifestation of the identity crisis and naivety of his film, which celebrates false independence. Movie Review
By admin / October 1, 2020
No fewer than 147 lawsuits have been filed by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) against the Trump administration. The first lawsuit came just a week after the inauguration, when Trump formalized an entry ban for Muslims. The Fight raised four of them. But the documentary by Elyse Steinberg and Josh Kriegman – this time forming a trio of directors with Eli B. Despres, who was their editor at Weiner (2016) – puts forward the human being, rather than the trio of proceedings.
In fact, emotions have been stirred from the first minute, when highlighting the immigrants who are threatened with deportation. We are reminded that this case involved human beings who were forcibly separated from their loved ones. Then we’re introduced to five ACLU lawyers: Brigitte Amiri, Joshua Block, Lee Gelernt, Dale Ho, and Chase Strangio. The five of them were involved in handling the four biggest cases, namely about abortion, LGBT in the military, voting rights, and immigrants. Top Movie Site
Not having much time to face the “Goliath” named “Donald Trump Administration”, the five “Davids” devote all their efforts so that they barely have time for the family at home, gathering material, conducting trial simulations (called “moot court”). They are fast and agile, and so are the films. The three directors wrapped The Gift with a fast tempo, without losing the neatness of their story, so that the general audience would have no trouble digesting the points surrounding the law and the trial.
Interestingly, we almost never enter the courtroom, given the prohibition against recording in some types of trials. Instead, several animated sequences are used, adding a variety of styles, in addition to conventional talking heads, and a vérité that captures the details of the activities of our five lawyers. While some of the footage, both Trump’s speech, and the recording of the narrative of his crooks, are effective in reminding the audience of how chaotic his regime is, which from the first second has shown the degradation of human values.
Unfortunately, once the intensity of the four cases has increased, where the problems become more and more complicated, it becomes increasingly difficult for the film to maintain a solid storytelling. It began to feel that the number of conflicts in The Fight exceeded what the makers were able to show. The dynamics have begun to be neglected to be guarded, as a result of the demands to summarize all cases, which take turns giving rise to new progress. Best Movie
Apart from these four cases, the hit-and-run tragedy in the middle of a demonstration in Charlottesville, has apparently not been ruled out. Controversy arose when the ACLU, based on the right to free speech, defended white supremacists and neo-Nazis to spread feelings. This matter also created differences of opinion among the top brass, and some members even opted out. But only a few facts are presented. Rather than exploration, its existence is limited to bonds, because it would feel awkward if the event was overlooked. The Charlottesville tragedy deserves its own documentary, which examines the complexities of the principles of free speech.
The Fight is not about that. The Fight is about oppressed minorities, and the abuse of power at the hands of the rulers that destroy humanity. David’s battle against Goliath, where easily, the audience will defend David. If not, then you are not the target market for this film, which depicts ACLU lawyers like real-world superheroes. Is it wrong? No, if you, like me, are among the target market, who believe that America is led by a supervillain in the real world. Movie Review
By admin / September 28, 2020
“Women are never to be entirely trusted — not the best of them,” said Sherlock Holmes in the novel The Sign of the Four (1890). It doesn’t take much research to conclude that Sherlock is not a defender of equality. How would it be, if he had a younger sister who inherited their mother’s feminine thoughts and was no less in terms of deduction than the famous detective? This interesting idea underlies Enola Holmes, who adapted the novel series The Enola Holmes Mysteries (to be precise the first book, The Case of the Missing Marquess) by Nancy Springer. Top Movie Site
As its name is the opposite of the word “alone”, Enola (Millie Bobby Brown) grew up alone, while his two brothers, Mycroft (Sam Claflin) and Sherlock (Henry Cavill) have made names in their respective careers. His eccentric mother, Eudoria (Helena Bonham Carter), teaches Enola to live independently, equipping him with all knowledge, both knowledge from books and martial arts training. Until right on his 16th birthday, Enola found his mother missing.
Enola’s intention to find her mother met with obstacles when her two sisters came home, especially from Mycroft’s insistence on sending her to a personality school, so that Enola would become a “dignified woman” so that it would be easy to find a husband. What about Sherlock? Compared to the two most recent incarnations that the public is most familiar with (the version of Robert Downey Jr. and Benedict Cumberbatch), Henry Cavill’s Sherlock tends to be warm, friendly, more open-minded about gender, and less-psychotic. Several times he defended, even helped Enola. Not the best Sherlock figure, with a simplified portrayal, but definitely the most suitable for the young adult film’s target market. Best Movie
The manuscript made by Jack Thorne (Wonder, The Secret Garden) contains the main formulas (read: clichédic) themed film empowerment from the mainstream: female protagonists who want to be free so they are considered wild, old-fashioned men who believe that women must be polite and respectful at the same time feminism is a form of madness, a female character who helps perpetuate this ancient mindset, to the seed of romance involving men who support gender equality. The man is a young Viscount Tewkesbury (Louis Partridge) who has run away from the house.
In addition to looking for his mother’s whereabouts, now Enola must also protect Tewkesbury from being chased by the killer (Burn Gorman) who was sent by whom. A story was created about the process of young women recognizing the harshness of the outside world, and having to struggle with applying everything their mothers taught. A family drama, a story of two women.
It’s a relief to see Millie Bobby Brown (also co-producer of this film) not trapped in the stereotype of her role on Stranger Things. His powerful appearance, intriguing as a character who often “breaks through the fourth wall”, is also convincing as a smart detective. Intelligence that is not only applicable in matters of solving mysteries, also enables him to turn the symbols of sexism into things that benefit him.
Enola’s journey of collecting clue pieces (mostly in the form of puns) is fun to follow, especially when Harry Bradbeer, making his directorial debut, applies some unique visual styles. Cheer up. At least in the first half, before the film loses its sense of urgency entering the middle of its duration. There were no surprises, and as time went on, the number of questions that aroused curiosity decreased. Enola managed to outperform everyone, be it male or female. But did he really solve the case? The answer is “no”. As a result, even though it presents a fun adventure as a potential franchise opener, Enola Holmes’s empowering elements are not very satisfying. Movie Review
By admin / September 24, 2020
Based on the novel of the same name by Donald Ray Pollock, The Devil All the Time opens its presentation by introducing Sergeant Willard Russell (Bill Skarsgård), who recently returned from his assignment in the Solomon Islands during World War II. From the name, it could be guessed that Willard was Arvin’s father. Willard marries a cafe waitress named Charlotte (Haley Bennett), and after Arvin is born, chooses to live in the remote hills of Knockemstiff.
Even though the years have passed, Willard is still haunted by the terrible incident when one of his comrades was crucified and tortured by Japanese soldiers. Willard kills his partner to end his suffering, not knowing that it will give him any prolonged suffering. Willard also made his own place of worship in the middle of the forest, put up a cross that reminded him of a traumatic incident, and invited little Arvin to pray there. Looking at Skarsgård’s eyes, we know Willard has never completely escaped the world’s hell, but has fallen even deeper. Top Movie Site
But that’s not all the story this film has. There’s about Helen (Mia Wasikowska), a religious girl who is married to Roy (Harry Melling), a radical preacher; Lenora (Eliza Scanlen), daughter of Helen with a religiosity similar to her mother, who meets Preston (Robert Pattinson) a pedophile pastor; married couple Carl (Jason Clarke) and Sandy (Riley Keough) who commit serial killings as a spiritual method to get closer to God; also Sheriff Lee (Sebastian Stan) the corrupt cop.
Apart from being the bestsellers, the Holland-Pattinson duo also gave the best performances among the ensemble cast. In the James Dean style, Holland shook off the “good teenage” image he acquired after playing Peter Parker, as a young man who doesn’t hesitate to resort to violence, because that’s what his father taught him. Meanwhile, Pattinson makes it easy for the audience to curse his character, but at the same time, stunned, at home staring at the screen every time he appears.
So many stories with different time and place settings can be handled by the script that was written by director Antonio Campos with his brother, Paulo Campos. Instead of being messy, the many branches actually make the speech tight, where the dynamics are always maintained without a single boring point. The use of voice over helps direct the audience to understand the details and the relationship between events which are quite complex. The novelist, Donald Ray Pollock, is the narrator in a deep, husky voice that amplifies the atmosphere. We are listening to an old man who has witnessed all the darkness of the world, telling stories accompanied by a bottle of whiskey. Best Movie
And it cannot be denied, The Devil All the Time is indeed dark. Very dark. Depressive nuances wrap stories filled with death, both murder and suicide, which, rather than sadism, emphasize psychological effects. Not to mention the matter of harassment, to other moral degradation. Whether or not all of this is debatable, but clearly not without purpose. Reading the plot excerpt above, apart from a few surprises that meet the paths of each character, maybe you can catch one more common thread, namely religiosity.
The majority of madness in character is based on devotion to God. But this is not a form of blaming religion, but a description of how terrible it is when the application of religion is interpreted by humans (read: Americans) who are unable to think clearly due to shocks in their souls. The shock, according to the film, started with war. That a mental problem caused by war can have a long and wide impact. It is even more terrible, because there is no sign that everything will end soon, when the rulers (state leaders, religious leaders) are still abusing their power. The characters act in the name of God, but it was the devil all the time. Movie Review
By admin / September 21, 2020
Hamilton recorded a Broadway musical of the same name (three shows put together to be precise) by Lin-Manuel Miranda. We are invited to sit with the audience at the Richard Rogers Theater where we can hear laughter and applause throughout the performance. But not even once we are brought up on stage. The camera always captures events from the front, even in multiple shot setups (including 13-14 musical numbers) taken using a Steadicam, crane and dolly.
As if there was a barrier that director Thomas Kail didn’t want to penetrate. The film allows the stage reality to remain on the stage, separating it from the real reality in the audience seats. Because what you want to give is the viewing experience. When close ups are used, the aim is not to diffuse reality, but merely to “compensate” for the atmosphere that will not be felt when watching on the screen. A conventional approach may lead to stronger musicals, but this is the best result to be had from the above objectives. Top Movie Site
Miranda’s manuscript adapted Ron Chernow’s Alexander Hamilton biography. Quite a bold adjustment, applied. Some of the most notable are the use of modern hip hop music, and the use of non-white players to play the founding fathers of the United States. Miranda made a “very white” story that became rich in diversity. Racist humans and adherents of white supremacy will undoubtedly burn their beards hearing the lyrics “Immigrant, we get the job done!”.
Miranda himself plays Hamilton, an immigrant from the Caribbean Island of Nevis, whom we follow along the 160-minute journey. Starting from his arrival in New York in 1776; involved in the resistance to colonialism King George III (Jonathan Groff) and his friends, including the French aristocrat, Marquis de Lafayette (Daveed Diggs) and Hercules Mulligan (Okieriete Onaodowan) the spy of Irish descent; became George Washington (Christopher Jackson’s) right hand man during the United States Revolution; until he assumed the post of Minister of Finance after independence.
If you are not used to watching musical sung-throughs, you may find it difficult to catch a line of Lin-Manuel Miranda’s “history lessons”. Moreover, it is not just sung, the majority of the dialogue is rapped. But for those who are familiar, will easily be amazed, both by the show itself, and the translation into film media. I was amazed by the actors, who were still at their prime, moving vigorously to every corner of the stage while throwing rap verses, which required a combination of stamina with extraordinary breathing techniques. Best Movie
I was amazed by the aesthetic. Lighting games, changing sets that blend seamlessly with the dance, to the center stage which can be rotated 360 degrees as a means of playing with blocking, where perfect timing of the movements and singing of the players is a must.
Regarding the film, assisted by the editing of Jonah Moran, Kail was able to strengthen the emphasis of the moment, which was achieved on stage through the play of lights and the motion of the actors. Kail knows when to use wide shot, medium shot, tracking shot, and close-up, to bring the impression as close as possible to watching it live in the theater. Although it must be admitted that Hamilton’s achievements clearly depended on the quality of his performances.
Meanwhile, the choice of music is a high achievement. Hip hop is full of sharp words as a platform for creative creativity, including when heated cabinet meetings are transformed into rap battles, R&B, to pop and ballads, coming together to create a variety of colors and flavor effects. The adrenaline was spurred on, the tears flowed several times. Meanwhile, the most laughter was present every time George III appeared. His figure is like a clown, as a satire of his cruelty, who says he wants to express his love for the people through massacres. I also chuckled to hear his surprise at George Washington’s resignation as President, because he did not know that the country’s leader could resign.
Arrogance, plus power, might make George III forget, or even care less, how history recorded his name. But Hamilton cares. Likewise Aaron Burr (Leslie Odom Jr.). Both may have different ideologies. Hamilton always stepped on the gas, while Burr chose to wait patiently. However, when the nation was formed, they both wanted to lay the foundation for their respective children. “Gotta start a new nation, gotta meet my son”, said Hamilton with teary eyes.
But when legacy matters clash with political filth, it’s not that easy to implement. There were actions of attacking each other, betraying each other, and even tragedy. From there we see if this film (automatically the show is the same) refuses to cult the protagonist. Hamilton is far from being holy, but that doesn’t mean his legacy is useless. The closing moment conveyed that, when his wife, Eliza (Phillipa Soo) sang an emotional number, Who Lives, Who Dies, Who Tells Your Story. Actually, Eliza was not the only time to steal the show. Every appearance always provokes emotion. Movie Review
Eliza is not the main character. The titles of films and shows do not bear his name. However, like other figures, he is a substantial part of the narrative recorded in history and his legacy will always be remembered. And of course, that “gasp”. Little closing gesture that raises lots of questions. Why did Eliza gasp? Did he break the boundaries of the realities of space and time and then see how his legacy was passed down along with the development of the nation he witnessed its birth? Or was it the “breaking the fourth wall” moment where Eliza made eye contact with the audience, realizing that her legacy formation had always been witnessed? Or the form of an “exclamation mark” from Lin-Manuel Miranda, to close his story which is like a series of emphatic statements?
By admin / September 21, 2020
Games Online dan Offline
Two years after the events of The Babysitter (2017), Cole (Judah Lewis) is now in high school, still a victim of bullying due to being considered insane. Due to the lack of evidence, people refuse to believe that Cole was nearly killed by Bree (Samara Weaving) and the devil worshipers. Only her best friend, Melanie (Emily Alyn Lind) believes. Top Movie Site
Cole still likes Melanie. Every time he interacted with his crush, the people around Cole moved slowly, as if the world belonged only to the two of them. But like the joke of “Good girls like bad guys”, Melanie is actually dating Jimmy (Maximilian Acevedo), a handsome, burly man with a typical frat boy annoying personality. When he finds out that his parents are secretly sending him to psychiatry school, Cole accepts Melanie’s invitation to run away to spend a weekend at a party on a lake with Jimmy and his friends.
Cole thought, this is his chance to win back the girl’s heart. A large condom has been prepared, and everything seems to be going well at first, until the bloody terror of the devil worshiper group returns to Cole. I’m not going to reveal how that happened, but don’t forget, it’s a “film shitpost”. The script by director McG (Charlie’s Angels, Terminator Salvation, The Babysitter), along with three other writers, offers no plausible explanation based on logic.
All origin, all inconsequential. Including when The Babysitter: Killer Queen made the mystical element — which was guarded by its ambiguity by the first film — into reality, in order to bring back the bloodthirsty teenagers who we know very well their characteristics from death. But now Cole is not alone. Phoebe (Jenna Ortega), a new student with a dark past, is also dragged into the chase that spills more blood. Best Movie
Remember when Bee and his friends slaughtered a geeky teenager and made his blood spurt like being thrown from a bucket? The scene appeared more and more frequently, with nearly every death, which McG, executed in a more gory, more over-the-top manner, with a creativity that still deserves praise. And as already mentioned, some random, absurd scenes are tucked in every now and then, which in effect, can be annoying, but can also add to the enjoyment. I felt a second impact.
By admin / September 17, 2020
There will certainly be many comparisons between this Malayalam film and Searching (2018), considering that both of them carry the desktop film sub-genre, as well as stories about cases of missing persons. I am always excited about this kind of spectacle. The spectacle that requires the scriptwriter to think creatively creates a solid story amidst limitations. C U Soon himself was completely shot with the iPhone, and was produced from May to July during the pandemic.
Set in Dubai, for about 98 minutes, the flow is conveyed through applications on laptop and smartphone screens (WhatsApp, Team Viewer, Google Hangouts, etc.), which begins with a meeting between Jimmy (Roshan Mathew) and Anu (Darshana Rajendran) in the application. date. Every day they talk via chat and video call. Jimmy, who recently ended his relationship, seems more aggressive. Meanwhile, Anu, despite giving a positive response, seemed to be hiding something. Top Movie Site
Mahesh Narayan, as the director and scriptwriter, was able to imply that Anu has a secret. The audience is led to make guesses, which makes the first half so interesting, even before there really is a significant conflict, thanks to the good storytelling pacing. In fact, about the first 45 minutes, we were only treated to the PDKT process of two lovebirds, until finally, Jimmy proposed to Anu even though he only knew him a few weeks ago and had never met face to face.
The real mystery arrives when Anu disappears. There were several incidents between the proposal and the disappearance of Anu, but for the sake of watching pleasure, I will not describe them. In order to find his fiancé, Jimmy asks his cousin Kevin (Fahadh Faasil), who happens to be a software expert, to help. Together with Kevin’s investigation, C U Soon established a mystery that succeeded in getting the audience to guess, and was also good at tricking us into thinking about wrong conclusions.
The limitations of the media are barely noticeable when Mahesh deftly moves his investigation from one application to another, from one web to the next, embarking on the exciting journey of “bread crumbs”. Gopi Sundar’s music always accompanies it, with an impact that is not always positive. The investigation becomes even more tense, but when it arrives at the dramatic moment, the music stands out too much, stripping away the “raw” impression that should have been a feature of desktop films as the evolution of the found footage subgenre.
Back to talking about limitations, not only the script being tested, also acting. Darshana Rajendran is not confined by a narrow space, mostly only able to reveal the faces of the actors. Through expression alone, we can see Anu’s pain, which also implies ambiguity and limitless possibilities. Meanwhile, Roshan Mathew has clearly put in her best efforts, but unfortunately, Jimmy’s character made it difficult for me to feel sympathetic to her. Best Movie
Jimmy is hard to like. He is often pushy. For a moment, Anu didn’t reply, he immediately bombarded him with chat or a series of calls. Jimmy was in a hurry in his relationship, often ignoring what his partner said. Maybe C U Soon really wanted to convey about the absence of a long thought process in a relationship where lovers don’t really know each other. When Anu disappears, Jimmy doesn’t know who his future wife’s friends are, or the places he might visit. Even if that was the goal, couldn’t the script still give the protagonist one or two positives?
After her intense investigation, C U Soon stumbled when it was time to answer a question, which actually contained an important issue regarding human trafficking. The presentation was draggy due to trying too hard to build a melodrama through endless vlogs. And after Kevin’s extraordinarily hard work, it seemed that all was in vain, because elsewhere Jimmy had gotten the answer easily. I also asked, “What’s the use of this film?”. Cheer up? Of course. Vain? Unfortunately, yes. Movie Review
By admin / September 14, 2020
Games Online dan Offline
Top Movie Site
Will’s return is followed by a series of strange events that occur in his new home. Dee-Dee had seen a strange man in the window and watched their house from outside and there was a mystery which was later revealed that in the house there was a family who was slaughtered by Peter Ward, the head of the family itself. Libby’s confusion about their new home makes Will try to find out what really happened in that house. Her neighbor, Ann Paterson (Naomi Watts), a wife who has separated from her husband and is struggling to get custody of her only child, looks uncooperative when asked by Will. Whereas Ann’s house is right across from Will’s and she has lived there for many years. Finally, after finding out that Peter Ward, the killer is being held in a mental hospital, Will goes there and starts investigating what happened. From this point on, the entire film’s plot changes. Will’s appearance underwent a transformation (most notably Daniel Craig’s hairstyle, which I think was Dedi Corbuzier’s model and really doesn’t fit. Hahaha) because Will is actually Peter Ward himself. He is accused of being the mastermind behind the deaths of his wife and children. The name Will he created himself when he experienced periods of mental illness and did not accept the fact that he was accused of being the slaughter of the family he loved so much.
But behind all the surprises, the main actors of the mystery are the Patterson family. Ann’s husband, whose name is Jack, apparently married Ann just to take Ann’s inheritance, because that’s why he is fighting for the custody of Chloe (Rachel G. Fox), their only child, because if Chloe’s custody is obtained, then he will inherit Ann. Jack then contacted someone who was to kill Ann and gave Ann’s home address on the same day Peter (Will) came home from work the day he resigned. What happened then? The person Jack had ordered turned out to be wrong to visit Ann’s house and he killed the wrong person, the victims of which were Libby and her two daughters. Incidentally, Peter came home at the same time and while trying to incapacitate the man he was holding the gun that was used to kill his family. He also became the only person living in his family and accusations of murder were directed to him. Best Movie
But behind all the surprises, the main actors of the mystery are the Patterson family. Ann’s husband, whose name is Jack, apparently married Ann just to take Ann’s inheritance, because that’s why he is fighting for the custody of Chloe (Rachel G. Fox), their only child, because if Chloe’s custody is obtained, then he will inherit Ann. Jack then contacted someone who was to kill Ann and gave Ann’s home address on the same day Peter (Will) came home from work the day he resigned. What happened then? The person Jack had ordered turned out to be wrong to visit Ann’s house and he killed the wrong person, the victims of which were Libby and her two daughters. Incidentally, Peter came home at the same time and while trying to incapacitate the man he was holding the gun that was used to kill his family. He also became the only person living in his family and accusations of murder were directed to him. Movie Review
By admin / September 10, 2020
Four years after winning the hearts of the audience when filling in the voice of Moana, Auliʻi Cravalho finally had the opportunity to make her live action debut in the adaptation of Matthew Quick’s Sorta Like a Rockstar, who is also the author of the novel The Silver Linings Playbook. Cravalho immediately exuded his charm from the first minute through singing, little dancing, and big smiles, while teaching English to Korean mothers through Shirley Ellis’ The Clapping Song. I believe, after this his name will take off, even though All Together Now is not a spectacle that will be remembered.
Cravalho plays Amber, a cheerful teenager with a noble heart. Every weekend she volunteers at a nursing home, accepting only generous donations as payment for teaching English, as well as leading her school friends to organize talent shows with the aim of helping those in need. He likes to help, but is reluctant to accept the helping hand of others, as taught by his mother, Becky (Justina Machado).
She held that principle, until Amber told no one that now she and her mother were homeless, after leaving the house of Becky’s violent lover. Luckily, Becky works as a school bus driver, so that the two of them can secretly take shelter for a while on the bus that he drives. The two of them love each other, but Becky has a problem. He’s an alcoholic. And no matter how many times Amber expressed disapproval, Becky still wanted to go back to her boyfriend. In fact, in addition to having “played hands”, it was this man who also dropped him into the abyss of alcoholism.
Top Movie Site
When Amber’s cheerfulness is gone, so is the charm of this film, which in the previous minutes, was so dependent on Cravalho’s energy. His dramatic acting is realistic, but the script by director Brett Haley (Hearts Beat Loud, All the Bright Places) with Matthew Quick and Marc Basch is like being confused about the protagonist’s grief. Instead of exploration, repetitions are carried out. The script repeats the depiction of how sad and hopeless Amber is, and how those around her try to provide support in the same way. Amber was tired of being constantly offered help, I was tired of the reps of her films.
But as the title implies, All Together Now is still a hopeful treat, with an important message that is quite relevant, considering that many individuals today are starting to become apathetic to togetherness in the social sphere. Accepting favors and / or gifts does not indicate weakness, nor is it wrong, especially if we really need it.
The talent show that filled the third round is indeed another form of simplification, with a presentation that could have been stronger if Amber and her friends’ relationship filled the screen more often, but it must be admitted, an appearance as the highlight of the show, managed to appear both warm and touching. Smiles and tears coincide, while perfecting the message about the social dynamics. Movie Review
By admin / September 7, 2020
Games Online dan Offline
Three of the four teenagers are schoolmates. Duncan (Lewis Gribben), Dean (Rian Gordon), and DJ Beatroot (Viraj Juneja). The three of them were sent to the program for causing chaos, including blowing up the toilet and its “contents.” Another teenager named Ian (Samuel Bottomley). Unlike his three colleagues, Ian participated on his own, in order to obtain a certificate, which he thought would be useful when registering for college.
The difference that arises is that, unlike the trio of troublemakers, Ian comes from an upper middle class family. While other children are having fun joking around, Ian is busy reading maps or filling out checklists containing team performance assessments. “Work hard on what you do and everything would come true”, said Ian, to which Dean only responded with laughter. There is a real gap in strata and privilege. When Ian set out to study law at a top university, Duncan and Dean eagerly looked forward to a £ 6.5 per hour fishing job.
But in the eyes of The Duke (Eddie Izzard) and The Duchess (Georgie Glen), all four are the same: pests. In the midst of a journey that is already full of obstacles, the lives of the four of them are in fact threatened, when the blue blood couple chases them. Like many whites in power, The Duke and Duchess saw themselves as superior. Like many generations of boomers, The Duke and The Duchess blame the current generation for destroying the world, even though in reality, they are the ones who inherit the destruction of the world. Best Movie
Simultaneously, the local police under the leadership of Sergeant Morag (Kate Dickie), who were previously busy investigating the bread theft case, began to shift their focus to hunting down terrorists. What does this have to do with the journey of our four protagonists? Later, the common thread will be revealed through intriguing stories about the incompetence and racism of the apparatus, which complements the success of Ninian Doff (also sitting in the director’s chair) in producing a sharp script in criticism without losing his antics.
The humor varies, from the satire resulting from communication difficulties between individuals of different classes, to the idiocy of their character, which, although extreme, is not surprising, because they are children who blow up toilets for content (and attention). The humor in the story full of chaos makes the film appear dynamic, especially when Doff’s powerful directing is supported by hip hop songs, some surreal visuals where each character eats “something”, and the acting of the four main characters which ultimately makes the audience willing to support them, no matter how much Ian whines, or how crazy or stupid his three friends behave. Movie Review
By admin / September 3, 2020
Games Online dan Offline
The opening sequence features an accident at night. A car was hit by a truck. But it wasn’t an accident. A man accidentally crashed his truck, then killed the two car passengers, then obliterated their bodies. Five years later, another murder case occurred. Raghuveer Singh (Khalid Tyabji) is found dead in a room, right after getting married to a much younger girl named Radha (Radhika Apte). Radha is Raghuveer’s second wife, after his first wife died five years ago. Top Movie Site
Inspector Jatil Yadav (Nawazuddin Siddiqui) is in charge of investigating the case. Suspicion certainly leads to Radha, but Jatil simply refuses to believe it. Despite facing a lot of opposition, from partners who consider him “looking for something that doesn’t exist”, to members of the legislative assembly who happen to have close ties with the Singh Family, Jatil still believes that this case is both bigger and more complex than it looks. But really? Was Jatil really a careful investigator, or was he only distracted by feelings of sympathy (which later turned into love) for Radha?
Many — though not all — of the whodunit treats are set in one location, in order to maintain focus and increase intensity in the puzzle-solving process, while strengthening characterizations and interactions between individuals. Raat Akeli Hai chose the opposite approach. The scale is enlarged, the conflict is enlarged. The problem is that Smita Singh’s writing has not been that solid, resulting in a complexity that is often confusing rather than fun to solve. After an early half that aroused curiosity, the intensity in the following minutes weakened, along with the increasing problems of the location visited by the inspector. Best Movie
I understand that Smitha has a lot of worries about social issues. Power abuse, domestic abuse, sexual abuse, beauty standards, and others. But not all of them need to be included, so as to make the film roll for nearly two and a half hours. Some points are of inferior substance. One of them was about Jatil, who was demanded to get married immediately by his mother (Ila Arun), which was included only as a pioneer for an element of romance which also did not need to exist, because: 1) It did not enrich the story; and 2) Without a commensurate emotional payoff.
A myriad of characters appeared, but due to the lack of color typical of each other, nothing really interesting to follow. There is one character who has a big role in the final half (including bringing up an important issue), but as long as the duration is not given adequate portions, it strips away the impact when he finally gets the spotlight. At least, our protagonist is more complex. Coupled with the fearless appearance of Nawazuddin Siddiqui as a fearless law enforcer in black glasses and leather jacket, Jatil is not a holy protagonist. His anger often exploded, he did not hesitate to give slaps to those who disturbed the investigation. Meanwhile, Radhika Apte is good at processing feelings, even though his character stops at the level of “an accused” and “a candidate for Jatil’s mate” rather than an individual who stands alone. Even though there is a potential for gender issues to be raised from the figure.
Honey Trehan, previously known as casting director, is making her directorial debut here. The results weren’t bad. The storytelling is dynamic, even with the help of Pankaj Kumar’s camera system and the artistic department team, Honey is able to polish Raat Akeli Hai to spoil the eyes. Even so, it is still green and not capable enough to be able to save the weakness of the script, including the moment of explaining the answer which should be the highlight of a whodunit, but instead is presented with minimal intensity due to hasty execution, which is no less confusing than the investigation. Movie Review
By admin / August 31, 2020
Games Online dan Offline
Several informants stated that (at least in the past) there was discrimination, as well as some confusion regarding how to treat female soldiers. Outside of the IAF, the Indian navy only had female pilots in 2019, and the army aviation division has yet to open its doors. This means that although the accuracy surrounding the conditions of the IAF is debatable, sexism in the military space, which is synonymous with masculinity, is not making it up.
Once upon a time, Gunjan Saxena (Janhvi Kapoor), daughter of a retired military officer with the rank of Lieutenant Colonel, Anup Saxena (Pankaj Tripathi), dreams of becoming a pilot. Despite her father’s support, her mother (Ayesha Raza Mishra) strongly opposes, while her older brother, Anshuman (Angad Bedi), who is a member of the army, expressed disapproval. “I’m worried about Gunjan’s safety,” he told his father. Don’t we often hear sexism under the guise of such caring? In line with, “Women do not wear sexy clothes, it is dangerous, men can be seduced”.
Gunjan Saxena: The Kargil Girl highlights the fragility of male masculinity, which is summed up perfectly by the protagonist’s punchy line to his boss: “The problem is not my weakness, but your fear. You’re afraid that if I become superior, everyone has to pay respect. That will be the end of your manhood. Throughout the film, you will often find similar quotable sentences. The sentences that are arranged so neatly by the two writers, without losing honesty.
But if this film carries empowerment, why does Gunjan often need men’s help to get out of trouble? I don’t see it as a “men savior” narrative, but a message to privileged holders so they don’t stand idly by. So that as Gunjan said to Anshuman, each individual must change first, so that the world may also change. It should be noted, Gunjan does not depend on it. If the world doesn’t give it a chance, it creates the opportunity itself, just like when it created an impromptu dressing room. However, there are doors that are impossible to enter in a world full of injustice. Here, it is the duty of Anup and Commander Gautam Sinha (Manav Vij) to open the door as privileged owners.
Making his directorial and writing debut, Sharan Sharma, who was previously assistant director Karan Johar, proved his ability to speak military-flavored emotional dramas. His air sequence, culminating in a mission in the Kargil War (1999), was executed fairly solidly. At least, managed to avoid the artificial impression.
As a scriptwriter with Nikhil, Sharan follows the signature winning formula of Bollywood, wherever the issues raised are sure to boil down to the family sphere. Gunjan fights not only for himself, for his father, and unconsciously, for all Indian women. These are women who “only” want to realize their dreams, then contribute to changing the face of the country.
The song lines contain uplifting arrangements and lyrics that are suitable for building a positive mood of hope, while Sharan shows off his ability to direct warm moments. Of course the ranks of players made a big contribution. Pankaj always reconciles, not only for Gunjan, but also for the audience. Meanwhile, Janhvi will make the audience sympathize and believe that he is Gunjan Saxena the talented pilot. Was the Janhvi election a form of nepotism? Most likely so. But does he deserve this role? Of course! Movie Review
By admin / August 27, 2020
Historical drama film depicting 12 hours before Jesus Christ died on the cross. It was during these 12 hours that we were shown Jesus’ torture from being flogged to being crucified and dying there.
Top Movie Site
Mel Gibson was inundated with harsh criticism. The film was deemed too brutal and disturbing, the torture scene was denounced and deemed inappropriate for being appointed to the big screen. In addition, many think that Gibson puts forward anti-Semitism too much, because Gibson is considered to portray Jews as cruel.
The latest controversy, Passion of the Christ’s marketing team claimed that the film was accurate and recognized by the Pope. The Vatican swiftly denied that the Pope had made this statement. Many people suspect that the Passion of the Christ marketing team only fabricated this statement to increase the hype of this film. Despite the controversy, this film is still worth watching during the Easter period. It reminds us of Jesus’ suffering before dying on the cross.
By admin / August 24, 2020
Games Online dan Offline
This film is not really WOW. However, the comedy which is a bit sarcastic and vulgar plus the setting of the story in North Korea is what makes the film appeal. So he said, yesterday’s attack on the Sony database and hackers from the North Korean cyber army was also triggered by this film. Top Movie Site
The initial story of this film is that there are 2 very famous presenters from America, their name is Dave Skylark (James Franco). He has a talk show called “Skylark Tonight” whose producer is his own friend, Aaron Rapoport (Seth Rogen). Their talk shows always invite famous celebrities who also make controversial statements, for example Eminem who claims to be gay.
Gradually, they are even bored with the success of their talkshow. And finally Dave had an idea for an interview with Kim Jong Un! Aaron was already skeptical and said it was impossible, but it turned out that Kim Jong Un happened to be a fan of the Skylark Tonight event. Thinking that these two are a golden opportunity, apart from interviewing other guests than others, this will make Skylark Tonight even more so.
After Aaron arranged a schedule with a representative from North Korea to meet Kim Jong Un, they were finally invited to North Korea. However, the news that they wanted to have a live interview with Kim Jong Un was heard by the CIA. The CIA has a plan to kill Kim Jong Un, through Dave Skylark’s hands. In Dave’s hand, it will be stuck like a sticky tape whose surface is poison, now it is poison if it comes into contact with the skin, it can cause death. Kim Jong Un will be expected to die of the poison, when Dave gives a shaking hand. Best Movie
Did this plan work? The problem is, when they arrived in North Korea, they were greeted very, very well, lol. Kim Jong Un became Dave’s best friend, they were really close. Drinking Margaritas together, listening to each other’s curses, playing with tanks, playing basketball, etc. This actually made Dave’s judgment on the figure of Kim Jong Un, who he said had changed, Kim Jong Un was not a bad person, and he didn’t even become killed Kim Jong Un.
This film is also full of provocative propaganda so that the North Korean people carry out a coup. Because “this film also made North Korea fire its beard. They immediately hacked Sony’s server, Sony Pictures officials were threatened to be killed, then this film was also temporarily postponed. Finally, on December 25, 2014, this film was released by Sony for the first time to the internet (rent $ 6, buy $ 15 on Google Play and XBOX).
As for acting, Seth Rogen is not bad. “His acting is always okay to be the second actor like in 50/50, Neighbors, and The Green Hornet. Now the problem is in James Franco, according to my subjectivity, he is rather over acting, then trying for Mike Myers and Jim Carrey are really wannabe.But yes, thumbs up is enough, for some scenes he’s been successful, how come he laughs. Movie Review
By admin / August 20, 2020
Games Online dan Offline
Since the opening of the film, Gary Lionelli’s music has immediately invaded the audience’s ears with an orchestra like from a suspense film, which seems to emphasize the high urgency of the issue. But then again, can audiences outside America understand the urgency? Because, let alone the definition of gerrymandering, not necessarily have an understanding of the electoral system and its political atmosphere. Even the film itself shows that there are still many local people who don’t understand this. Top Movie Site
This is where the quality of the film’s storytelling is tested. Like a teacher who is not only smart for himself, but is good at sharing his knowledge with others, Slay the Dragon is able to explain gerrymandering in a concise and clear manner, thanks to the resource person who is good at composing sentences plus effective visualization. It is not just about “what”, the reason for the practice is cheating which injures democracy is well conveyed.
You can see the full explanation directly from the film, but in short, gerrymandering is the practice of dividing electoral boundaries with the aim of seeking profit for certain political parties, which occurs every 10 years, when each state in the United States carries out redistricting. Through gerrymandering, the parties in power can ensure that in the next election, victory is still theirs.
The term “gerrymandering” was used after in 1812, the governor of Massachusetts, established a new map shaped like a salamander. After Barack Obama’s victory in the 2008 election, the practice went crazy, after the Republicans who were cornered, started the REDMAP project. The division of electoral districts is increasingly absurd. Some are shaped like a dragon (the origin of the film’s title), until one of the strangest, Goofy kicks Donald Duck. Apparently that was only the beginning.
Apart from gerrymandering, the Republic has implemented other methods to minimize the chances of Democrats, including issuing regulations requiring voters to have Voter Id. The result was Trump’s victory in the 2016 election. As many as 45,000 people in Wisconsin were not allowed to vote, giving Trump victory in the state, where he has 22,000 votes. Best Movie
There are still many other facts provided by Slay the Dragon, making it an informative documentary, which will amaze ordinary audiences, especially those from outside the United States. We know that politics, including elections, is full of dirty intrigue, but bringing the audience to know how far and how systematically these intrigues are the hallmarks of Slay the Dragon. Although it must be admitted, it is likely that not all of them will be accommodated considering that so much data is present in a short time, plus cultural barriers (read: political culture) that limit the processing of information.
Besides being informative, Slay the Dragon also wants to be an inspirational documentary by describing the struggles of Katie Fahey, an activist from Michigan who is passionate about running a grassroots campaign to end gerrymandering, together with the Voters Not Politicians (VNP) organization she founded. The hope is that VNP’s journey from a small ripple that is doubtful will be able to collect 350,000 signatures on the petition into a national scale action that shakes the corrupt system, can move the hearts of the audience through the message “People’s voice will win”.
But there is one important point that the film forgets. It was stated that VNP had succeeded in reversing observers’ predictions, where the majority doubted their capacity. The question is: How? When many people don’t even know the meaning of gerrymandering, how has that success been achieved? Slay the Dragon forces the audience to accept the “miracle” as an inspirational achievement, at a time when it is not a miracle. There are many details that require understanding. But as a knowledge enhancer, this film is definitely worth watching. Movie Review
By admin / August 17, 2020
Games Online dan Offline
The opening moment immediately left an impression, even before the first image appeared, when a woman whispered a prayer. The owner of the voice is named Carmen (Margarita Kenéfic), who sits in a circle with a group of women. What are they praying for? Apparently, Carmen’s husband, Enrique (Julio Diaz), who his subordinates call “General”, is awaiting trial, to determine whether it is true that he committed genocide against the Maya. Top Movie Site
The General and his troops were accused of murdering and raping the Maya, as justification for the eradication of communism. Watch Enrique’s face. His white hair, thick mustache. Then look for the picture of Efraín Ríos Montt. Similar? Of course, because Bustamante and Sanchez really wanted to make La Llorona a reflection of reality as well as revenge for the nation’s wounds. More specifically, a woman’s wound.
The court found Enrique guilty, but the decision was overturned due to lack of evidence. As a result, dozens (or hundreds?) Of residents demonstrated in front of Enrique’s house, leaving the occupants of the house, including the General’s daughter and grandson, Natalia (Sabrina De La Hoz) and Sara (Ayla-Elea Hurtado), locked up for days. Occasionally the audience is invited to take a peek at the conditions outside the gate, but we hear more of the demonstrators’ non-stop screams, while the activities in the house are going on, as the rulers shut their ears to the people’s cries. Best Movie
Maybe in the eyes of many people, La Llorona is not horror, and Bustamante does not apply the mainstream pattern. No jump scares, no occult interruptions, at least not overtly and not in the first hour. La Llorona tends to put fear first. The fear of a dictator who was in power likes to spread fear. Even before the trial, Enrique is overpowered by fear. At midnight, he admits that he heard the cries of women, so he believes there are spies in the house. Whether the cry is indeed supernatural terror or just in Enrique’s head doesn’t matter. The point is, how after being stripped of power, the dictator is nothing more than a weak and pitiful old man.
Even though he doesn’t spit out terror openly, Bustamante ensures that the tense nuance is maintained. When assisted by the thick creepy images directed by Nicolás Wong, he creates an atmosphere full of anxiety and fear, as a representation of Enrique’s family’s heart. Then comes Alma (María Mercedes Coroy), a young girl who comes to replace the servants who in congregation decide to leave. Of course it is not difficult to guess Alma’s true identity, because along with his presence, terror becomes even more real. Following that is the process of uncovering the details of the truth through the carefulness of the script to spread clues, from Alma’s frequent “training” of Sara’s ability to hold her breath in water, to a series of nightmares that her character experiences every night. Do not miss the hint of the dark secret of the Enrique family.
Once on the third act, the payoff intensity offered was not too strong nor was the quantity too short, but it did not diminish the power of La Llorona’s storytelling, especially about empowerment. The film again emphasizes that in acts of harassment, sin does not only belong to the perpetrator, but also to those who choose to ignore it. Movie Review
By admin / August 13, 2020
Did you know that Scoob! is the first big screen animation to adapt the Scooby-Doo? Previously there were 33 animated films that have been made, including the crossover between Scooby and Batman (Scooby-Doo! & Batman: The Brave and the Bold) and WWE (Scooby-Doo! WrestleMania Mystery and Scooby-Doo! And WWE: Curse of the Speed Demon), but all of them are in direct-to-video status.
Naturally, the story begins with the first meeting of Shaggy (Will Forte) and Scooby-Doo (Frank Welker, the only voice actor for the original Scooby-Doo animated series, Where Are You! Who returns), when the two of them were still kids. The answer to the question “Which came first? Scooby-Doo or Scooby Snacks? ” was also given. Animated series Be Cool, Scooby-Doo! has also touched on the issue, even though the answers given are different. Best Movie
After one emotional moment — which should have gotten a payoff if the conclusions weren’t simplified — a minute after the next that will make fans feel nostalgic through the appearance of various features of the series. Sound effects, signature humor that involves disguising acts to outwit the “ghosts”, the words “And I would have gotten away with it too, if it weren’t for you meddling kids” that criminals utter after being arrested, to the best of them, are them. re-intro with its iconic theme song.
Scoob‘s early half! managed to restore childhood memories, as well as sparking enthusiasm waiting for what kind of mystery Mystery Inc. will investigate. this time. It is said, Fred (Zac Efron), Daphne (Amanda Seyfried), and Velma (Gina Rodriguez), felt that it was time for Mystery Inc. growing, by investigating bigger cases for more money. Simon Cowell (played by Simon himself) is ready to become an investor, with one condition: Shaggy and Scooby not involved. Through his trademark scathing comments, Simon felt that both of them were useless for the team. Top Movie Site
Heartbroken, Shaggy and Scooby, who were exasperating while playing bowling, were attacked by a group of small robots belonging to Dick Dastardly (Jason Isaacs), who for some reason tried to kidnap Scooby. Luckily, they are rescued by the superhero idol Shaggy as a child, Blue Falcon (Mark Wahlberg), along with his robot dog, Dynomutt (Ken Jeong), and Dee Dee Skyes (Kiersey Clemons) as the pilot of his pride, Falcon Fury.
Fans must be aware that these characters, even though they belong to Hanna-Barbera properties, are not from the Scooby-Doo series. The reason is predictable. Scoob! it was intended as an opening to the Hanna-Barbera cinematic universe. In fact, the Avengers-style crossover is an interesting prospect, given the uniqueness of each character. Unfortunately, similar to other cinematic universes, the effort to build a future destroys the present.
Scoob! swerved into a large-scale superhero film. Apart from the cinematic universe, bringing an animated series with a duration of 20-30 minutes containing light mystery investigations interspersed with chases and naming “ghosts”, to a 94-minute long film medium does need modification. But that does not mean being a superhero film full of bombastic action, with only a bit of the process of solving a mystery, which even seems to be summarized forcefully through a convoluted line of verbal exposition.
Even later, fantasy elements are included, bringing Scooby and friends to fight real monsters instead of humans in the guise of ghosts. Doesn’t that go against the essence of the series? Even more ironic, considering the birth of Scooby Doo, Where Are You! based on Hanna-Barbera’s intention to create non-violent cartoons to satisfy a group of parents, who were protesting against the superhero-themed spectacle wave in the mid-1960s.
Betray the foundation? Maybe, but minimal, Scoob! not tilled carelessly. The visuals feast on the eyes through sharp high contrast visuals, which also wrap up a climax that appears exciting thanks to director Tony Cervone’s dynamic direction. If only his efforts to “build the future” had been more careful. Movie Review